
You ordered a standard residential valuation. Three days later the fee has tripled, the turnaround has gone from two days to a week, and the report is now a “long form”. Nothing about the property changed. What changed is that the valuer looked at the title.
The standard residential product most lenders order is a fixed template. It assumes a property whose highest and best use is the thing already standing on it. The moment a valuer has to assess a property as something other than what it currently is, the template no longer applies and the job escalates to a long-form report.
That is a scope decision made by the valuer under professional standards, not a lender being difficult. Which is exactly why the usual workarounds do not work.
Instructing the valuer to ignore the development potential and value the property as a standard investment does not remove the requirement. The valuer still has to assess highest and best use, and at least one major lender’s valuations team has confirmed it has no discretion here at all: once a permit is flagged, acceptability of the security stops being a valuations question and becomes a credit decision.
Valuers have also confirmed that valuing a property exclusive of its development potential does not avoid the long-form requirement either.
This is where files die. A refinance has had conditional approval withdrawn late in a six-week assessment because credit only learned about an unused four-dwelling permit when the valuer escalated the report. The borrower had no development intention whatsoever — they simply wanted to keep holding the asset.
Tell credit about any permit, current or lapsed, in the application. Get written comfort that the security is acceptable with the permit before you build a timeline on it.
Where a market prices in a development premium, a hold-only buyer is not capturing that premium — and the valuer will say so. A long-form report on a permitted site frequently comes back below purchase price for exactly this reason. That is not a mistake to be queried; it is the valuer distinguishing what the property is worth to you from what it sold for to someone with a different plan.
Indicative ranges observed across deal correspondence over 2024–2026. Fees move; confirm current pricing before you quote a client.
The fee is the small part. The real cost is that the escalation lands mid-assessment, after the clock has started, and the extra days come out of your settlement buffer rather than the front of the process.
Budget for a long-form valuation any time a security carries development or subdivision potential in any form — a live permit, a lapsed permit, or simply enough land to be legally subdivided — irrespective of what you actually intend to do with it. Order it deliberately and price it in, rather than discovering it as an overrun.
One related asymmetry worth knowing: once construction has started on a site that was ordered as vacant land, an “as is” valuation will include whatever works have commenced. If you need an isolated land-only figure, that can only be produced through a long-form report with explicit instructions to exclude the improvements. A short-form scope cannot do it, no matter how it is instructed.
General information only. It is not credit assistance, financial product advice, or an offer of finance, and it does not take account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Fees, turnaround times and lender policies stated are indicative observations over 2024–2026 and change without notice.